On 11/11/14 06:05, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-10 12:19:19 -0800:
>> On 10/11/14 20:56, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:31:03 +0100 Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> syslog-nagios-bridge requires pynag 0.9.1+, older versions have a bug in
>>>> check result file generation:
>>>>
>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768928
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I added a constraint in syslog-nagios-bridge well before the freeze so
>>>> it would not propagate to testing until pynag 0.9.1 was uploaded:
>>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763378
>>>>
>>>> Note that the pynag upload in unstable is also cleaning out minified
>>>> jquery and other things that make the package more compliant with Debian
>>>> policy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am afraid I will have to reject this request in its current form.
>>>
>>> The changes to pynag is beyond what can be reasonably reviewed and
>>> indeed it is not a targeted fix for #768928. The changes to
>>> syslog-nagios-bridge are reasonable and I could accept them, but I
>>> understand it is of no use without pynag as well.
>>>
>>> Can you please provide a targeted fix for pynag?
>> This (just a few lines) could be dropped into
>> debian/patches/checkresult_fix.patch
>>
>> https://github.com/pynag/pynag/commit/3aad1176bca4b2f39c2c851396d30647efbf2bed
>>
>> Clint, would you be happy to upload 0.8.9 with that or would you like me
>> to NMU perhaps?
>>
>> Or is there any reason why the whole 0.9.1 should be considered for jessie?
> I think we should unblock 0.9.1.
Release team have been a bit reluctant to unblock whole new versions
without any justification at all
In this case though, maybe they can accept that there was a good reason
why it wasn't in testing before the freeze:
a) 0.9.1 was tagged 5 August
b) I sent a private email to Palli on 14 August about the bug and
uploading 0.9.1
c) sent follow up and commented on the bug tracker 29 September
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763378#10
d) noticed Palli's email bouncing on 3 November, you then made the
upload immediately, also removing some jquery artifacts to make it more
dfsg compliant
e) syslog-nagios-bridge is the only dependent package that I know of and
I have been testing that against pynag v0.9.1 locally. Do you know of
any other packages using pynag as a dependency?
It appears that a range of issues were fixed upstream in 0.9.0 and 0.9.1
- do you know if any of these issues justify an unblock for 0.9.1 or
maybe the collection of all these issues together justifies an unblock?
https://github.com/pynag/pynag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
