On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:14:49 +0100 intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Biebl wrote (03 Jul 2014 21:07:36 GMT) : > > Am 03.07.2014 20:57, schrieb Michal Suchanek: > >> Also candidate for big fat release note. > > > Nod. I guess the recommendation here is to simply mark non-critical > > mounts as nofail. > > [...] > > So maybe just documenting the fact that this needs to be done by the > > administrator is the best way. > > So, how about: > > 1. retitling this bug "Document behavior on missing/faulty filesystems
I retitled the bug report. > more prominently" (not sure if the doc should be in fstab(5) > and/or in systemd's NEWS.Debian) I don't think a NEWS.Debian entry would help that much. Afaik, such an entry would only be shown on *upgrades* of systemd, not fresh installations. It's also not really a behavioural change *in* systemd itself, only compared to sysvinit. Maybe adding it to README.Debian would be better. > 2. filing a release notes bug, whose expected outcome would be > a paragraph in the release notes that points to the aforementioned > documentation That has happened for the jessie release notes which had a dedicated section about this specific issue. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature