On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> > >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure > >> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. > >> And I just tested -- mumble_1.2.10-2 works with openssl_1.0.2d-3. > >> snapshot.debian.org has the before-and-after binNMU here: > > > > I assume you mean 1.0.2d-1 there. The soname changed between -1 > > and -3 you actually get a different binary package. > > Let me be more specific: mumble_1.2.10-2 that was built with > openssl_1.0.2d-1 works fine with openssl 1.0.2d-3 installed -- yet > mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 that was /built/ with openssl_1.0.2d-3 does not.
Please note the "openssl" binary package version doesn't change anything. You don't depend on it, you use the library. Mumble_1.2.10-2 uses the binary package "libssl1.0.0" (version 1.0.2d-1) while mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 uses libssl1.0.2 (version 1.0.2d-3). Kurt