On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 14:40 +0100, Luca Bruno wrote: > > I really don't know. You can pretend somebody jumped on me asking > > whether I was part of Debian and mentioned this issue that has been > > tagged wontfix. That wouldn't be very far from what happened. ;) > > > > I can add nettlifying unbound to my ever growing to-do list, and > > see > > what codepaths are involved there. Maybe someone even did that work > > upstream already, I didn't check yet. > > I went ahead and coded the "nettlify libunbound" part, which is > basically > option 3 proposed above. > I run this through upstream and they merged it today: > https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs-script/show_bug.cgi?id=594 > > This changes only touch libunbound (and the testcases) to build with > nettle, > while the rest of unbound still needs openssl or NSS (mostly for > TLS).
Luca, thank you for pursuing that. regards, Nikos