Am 29. November 2016 02:25:39 MEZ, schrieb Neil Roeth <n...@debian.org>: >On 11/26/2016 02:21 PM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >> Dear Neil, >> >> I've cleaned up the list of bugs which prevented the removal of jade, >> because I'd like to get Debian into shape before the near freeze. >> >> To my understanding, the only package left for jade is kannel, which >> has an RC bug (#828362) and will be auto-removed from testing on >> 2016-12-25. Therefore, jade could be removed without affecting >kannel. >> >> Are you going to file the removal bug then, or should I take care of >> that? >> >> Regards, >> Tobias >> >Thanks, Tobias. I created removal bug 846178 for jade. The jade >source >package builds both the jade and sp binary packages and I mentioned >that >in the bug report. Do I need to create a separate removal bug for each >binary package or is that one bug sufficient to enable the ftp masters >to remove everything that is built by that source package?
Hi Neil, one bug should be enough. It might be good to mention both removal tracking bugs: #811310 #811312 For more context for FTP-Masters. Done that now. Regards, Tobias
