On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 00:05 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > In either case I'm setting this to serious again because it makes > packages to fail on single-CPU systems, and having more than one CPU > is > definitely *not* part of the build-essential definition.
It is not, but trying to build packages below a path that includes whitespace or shell metacharacters is also not forbidden by the build- essential definition. Or on strange filesystems not fully following POSIX semantics. I think all of these are however uncommon configurations these days and wouldn't treat either as serious in my packages. Ansgar
