On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 16:45 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > both systemd and udev need to be upgraded in lockstep: > > > > a/ udev has Breaks/Replaces systemd (<< 224-2) > > b/ systemd has a Breaks/Replaces udev (<< 228-5) > > > > Forcing the upgrade of only one of the two will fail. > > if this is the case, then I think the packages metadata *must* > express this, > probably by depending on the appropriate udev/systemd versions. > > you cannot expect users to do the right thing by themselves ;-)
What should be wrong about the dependencies? Note that you ask apt explicitly to break stuff (in the logs I see " --force-yes" which is documented as potentially breaking systems; I hope users don't use that). Ansgar