Hi. from my point of view it is also better to have new boost-defaults in the unstable and fix needed packages there. We doe not have too much time for now to have an intermediate upload into experimental.
If this transition will be smooth and fast, we could consider to package 1.68/1.69. But it would probably be too risky and can potentially delay the next release. Regards Anton Am Mo., 24. Sep. 2018 um 02:21 Uhr schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com>: ... > Largely rebuilds in Ubuntu have been sufficient to identify and fix > the bulk of boost transition issues > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.67.html > > After the initial rounds of NMUs I typically work off the Debian > transition tracker to complete transition / files FTBFS bugs / NMU > patches. > > I can prepare the boost-defaults upload into experimental, but I'd > rather have this transition approved and boost-defaults uploaded into > unstable.
