Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> writes: > Implemented here: > <https://salsa.debian.org/jmtd/policy/commits/structured-vpackage-list> > <https://salsa.debian.org/jmtd/policy/commit/8948b734754f73022852c3839569e9416cb76ed1>
> I repeat the commit log message here. It's worded in terms of absolutes, > i.e. "do this, do that", since that's what the commit does, however, > please consider this a proposal (which I am advocating for), i.e. "I > propose converting...", "I suggest deleting..." etc. > I've been thinking of this for a long time and another situation came up > this week where I thought it would be helpful so I sat down and did it. I haven't had a chance to review the details yet, but wanted to send a quick and immediate reply to say *thank you* and I really appreciate you tackling this! I think this general idea would go a long way to making this data more useful. Does anyone reading the Policy list know of anything that would *break* if we converted the virtual package list to a structured form? I think it's likely we'll accept this if not, so this is a call for any issues that I'm not thinking of. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>