On 22/06/20 at 21:35 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 19:46:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > 
> > > > Depending on bsdmainutils to get col et al seems entirely right,
> > > > it's
> > > > been right forever, there doesn't seem to be a reason to break
> > > > that
> > > > both
> > > > for dependent packages and for end users.  Especially not without
> > > > notice.
> > > 
> > > There is no point arguing against your "do not change anything"
> > > attitude.
> > > 
> > I'm not saying don't change anything, I'm saying don't break stuff
> > for
> > users for no reason.
> 
> You are saying the reason is "it's been right forever".
> 
> The reason for this move is moving from the old and heavily patched BSD
> source to the more up-to-date GNU version.

I did a partial archive rebuild reverting to the version of bsdmainutils
with 'col' and others. It seems that the list of affected packages from
#963327 is complete with the exception of 'notmuch'.

A good plan would probably be to fix man-db, and look at what are the
remaining failures after that.

Lucas

Reply via email to