Hi all,
Have got the same bug at my end. Also see similar report in archlinux as well -

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/67978

1.
Sandbox: unsupported fd-relative fstatat(32, "", 0x7FFE49DBD7B0, 4096)
Sandbox: seccomp sandbox violation: pid 75078, tid 75078, syscall 262,
args 32 140293624582910 140730137565104 4096 4096 1.
Sandbox: unsupported fd-relative fstatat(38, "", 0x7FFE49DBABA0, 4096)
Sandbox: seccomp sandbox violation: pid 75078, tid 75078, syscall 262,
args 38 140293624582910 140730137553824 4096 4096 1.
Sandbox: unsupported fd-relative fstatat(38, "", 0x7FFE49DBABA0, 4096)
Sandbox: seccomp sandbox violation: pid 75078, tid 75078, syscall 262,
args 38 140293624582910 140730137553824 4096 4096 1.

As can be seen, the culprit seems to be the same syscall 262 which is
mentioned in the archlinux bug. Maybe something can be done about it ?

-- 
          Regards,
          Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com

E493 D466 6D67 59F5 1FD0 930F 870E 9A5B 5869 609C

Reply via email to