Hello. "¡Lo prometido es deuda!" as we say in Uruguay (what is promised is a debt). Tested your packages and now I can see correctly all the scanners, local and networked ones! So everything looks good to push those to Debian Stretch. Thanks a lot for doing all this! Greetings from another Allegro user&contributor ;-)
El sáb., 3 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 13:53, Sylvain Beucler (b...@beuc.net) escribió: > > Hi, > > The package is in this state since Aug 17, I think we can afford to wait > a few more days for testing. > So yes, please do test on Tuesday. > > Cheers! > Sylvain > > On 03/10/2020 00:41, Ivan Baldo wrote: > > Hello. > > The soonest I could try to check, is this Tuesday 6th 19:00 -0300, sorry. > > Let me know if that's useful or too late. > > Thanks! > > > > El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 10:22, Sylvain Beucler > > (b...@beuc.net) escribió: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 02/10/2020 13:51, Ivan Baldo wrote: > >>> El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 06:48, Sylvain Beucler > >>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>>> El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 19:32, Sylvain Beucler > >>>>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: > >>>>>> This could be due to a bug when building the 'all' and 'amd64' packages > >>>>>> separately. > >>>> > >>>> I can reproduce the 2 debdiff-s with 'debuild -A' and 'debuild -B' > >>>> respectively. > >>>> > >>>> I'm currently backporting fixes from 1.0.27-1~experimental3 to fix the > >>>> issue, and updating our procedures to test this case in the future. > >>> > >>> Great, thanks a lot!!! > >> > >> I prepared a new package at: > >> https://www.beuc.net/tmp/debian-lts/sane-backends/ > >> that I plan to upload as a regression fix. > >> > >> (Note: sane-dll is now consistently removed, as it previously evaded > >> deletion only in amd64, see #971592.) > >> > >> Can you test it? > >> > >> Cheers! > >> Sylvain > > > > > > -- Ivan Baldo - iba...@gmail.com - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/ Freelance C++/PHP programmer and GNU/Linux systems administrator. The sky isn't the limit!