Hello, On Wed 07 Oct 2020 at 06:43pm -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Josh, my current reading is that there is not support for even the > first step. I believe Guillem and I have disagreed, and I haven't > noticed support from anyone other than you. Speaking as Policy Editor, I agree. I don't see any sort of consensus that we should deprive ourselves of the ability to declare packages Essential. > C) I'd support non-normative documentation that we don't expect to > approve new essential packages in the future in policy. This sounds like a good idea to me too. -- Sean Whitton