On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 11:45:55 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > ===BEGIN > The Technical Committee resolves that Debian 'bookworm' should support > only the merged-usr root filesystem layout, dropping support for the > non-merged-usr layout. > > Until after the release of 'bullseye', any implementation of this > resolution must be done in the 'experimental' distribution, or otherwise > kept out of the critical paths for the release of 'bullseye'. > > We do not recommend any particular implementation of the migration. > > Y: Yes, support only merged-usr in the 'bookworm' release. > N: No, continue to support both layouts in 'bookworm'. > F: Further Discussion > ===END
I vote Y > F > N. This is on the assumption that we are defining merged /usr the same way we did when we resolved #914897 in <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/03/msg00001.html> (what Guillem Jover calls "merged /usr via aliased directories", with symlinks like /bin -> usr/bin). smcv