Hi Samuel On 16-03-2021 22:17, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Paul Gevers, le mar. 16 mars 2021 22:08:51 +0100, a ecrit: >> <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: >>> So we'd rather make release-notes document using apt instead of >>> apt-get? I'm fine with that but we *ALSO* need to make sure that debian >>> developers actually *test* that path, and not the apt-get path. >> >> Already the buster release notes talk about using apt instead of apt-get > > Mmm, actually no, it tells to use "apt-get upgrade" > > https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#minimal-upgrade > > Possibly this should be turned to > > "apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs" > > ?
Looking into history, I see we did this because of https://bugs.debian.org/931637. I guess your suggestion is a better alternative? Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
