Hi Paul! On 2021-08-18 at 21:46 (+02), Paul Gevers wrote:
[...] > Please go ahead. As you mentioned on IRC that you also maintain blender, > do you intent to upload that too, or should we schedule the binNMU's as > normal? Blender 2.93.2 in experimental is actually ftbfs on mipsel and I've pinged my upstream contacts to fix that, as well. They told me that they'll try to implement the solution already provided by sramacher (thanks Seb!) within next week. So I'll wait for it before uploading the experimental package to unstable/sid. My build tests were made as pure binNMU for the version of blender in unstable/sid at the moment. So normal approach is the way to go, for now. Thanks for asking. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
