Hi,

On 19-03-2022 14:48, Nilesh Patra wrote:
For avoidance of doubt, the canonical definition lives in the autopkgtest
package: 
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst

I usually refer /usr/share/doc/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.rst.gz in the 
autopkgtest package,
I believe that's the same thingy.

Agree, except it doesn't refer so nicely in on-line discussions *and* the on-line document may be more up-to-date than your local copy. But, you're right of course.

And I would have recommended negative architectures: "-arm64" and try to
test on all architectures not explicitly mentioned for the case where new
architectures are added.

That is what I always do, I add a negation as "!", which is also what I did in
this case:
        
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/toil/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control#L8

Oops. I should use the right syntax if I teach something...

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to