On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:00:43PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi,
> > Try something like this in /lib/udev/rules.d/60-nfs.rules: > > > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="sunrpc", \ > > RUN+="/sbin/sysctl -q --pattern ^sunrpc --system" > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="rpcrdma", \ > > RUN+="/sbin/sysctl -q --pattern ^sunrpc.svc_rdma --system" > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="lockd", \ > > RUN+="/sbin/sysctl -q --pattern ^fs.nfs.n[sl]m --system" > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="nfsv4", \ > > RUN+="/sbin/sysctl -q --pattern > > ^fs.nfs.(nfs_callback_tcpport|idmap_cache_timeout) --system" > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="module", KERNEL=="nfs", \ > > RUN+="/sbin/sysctl -q --pattern ^fs.nfs --system" > > > > Differently from the original file I tired anchoring the patterns, which > > looks more correct to me. > > Thanks, I will try to test this and bring to nfs-utils upstream. > Michael or Andras, if you can help testing it in your use cases that > would be helpful. I don't have a real world test case for this; I don't set any of those sysctls. Incidentally, busybox sysctl doesn't support --pattern, so if this functionality is important, nfs-kernel-server needs to force inclusion of the "big" /sbin/sysctl in the initramfs. AndrĂ¡s -- To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.