On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 7:09 PM Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:58 PM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:53 PM Martin-Éric Racine > > <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:36 PM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Package: dhcpcd-base > > > > Version: 9.4.1-21 > > > > Severity: important > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org > > > > > > > > For bookworm ntpsec has replaced the old ntp. > > > > See https://bugs.debian.org/1003966 > > > > > > > > ntpsec (1.2.1+dfsg1-5) experimental; urgency=medium > > > > . > > > > * Add ntpd.service alias > > > > * Add ntp transitional packages (Closes: 1003966) > > > > > > > > Now the hook is wrong to assume the existence of /etc/ntp.conf and > > > > /run/ntp.conf.dhcp > > > > > > Can you file a bug report upstream? As of 10.0.1-1 (pending upload), > > > I have deprecated Debian's NTP hooks and use upstream's NTP hooks > > > instead. Any missing support for alternative NTP daemons would be best > > > filed there. > > > > > > > It's filed for version 9.4.1-21, which is going to be included in > > Debian Bookworm. However ntpd has been replaced by ntpsec in Debian > > Bookworm. So the hook is wrong now. And the hook is a Debian specific > > patch. > > If you don't want to continue supporting ntpsec, I would suggest > > removing this non-working hook for Bookworm (and its autopkgtest). > > I'm not gonna introduce any change to the package for Bookworm this > late into the freeze. >
However this is a real bug for Bookworm. Shipping non-working parts is worse than non-support. ntpsec taking over ntpd already happens for Bookworm. -- Shengjing Zhu
