On Sun, 2023-06-25 at 20:15 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:29:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 11:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:13:58AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I was about to say "nothing other than a little more patience", > > > > given > > > > the request is only a few days old at this point. Looking back, > > > > however, it appears that there isn't actually a debdiff > > > > attached, > > > > as > > > > was claimed in the original mail. > > > > > > I apologize. Here we go. > > > > > > > Thanks. Please go ahead. > > Done. > > One more question that might be a good candidate for more in-depth > docs: > With both the bullseye and bookworm versions having been accepted to > the > respective proposed-updates repository, there is no longer need to > hold > back uploads to unstable, right? I can resume normal work on the > packages after the acceptance of the package for bullseye? >
There's no need to block uploads to unstable on anything happening in (o)pu, no. The only requirement is that if the issue also affects unstable then it be fixed there first. Presumably future uploads to unstable wouldn't revert any fixes. Regards, Adam
