Hi! On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:15 PM Patrick Franz <delta...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 23:32:53 +0800 Bo YU <tsu.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > Could you try it on the next upload? > > > > Thanks again for all here. > > Before we can consider applying this patch, there is the question of > maintenance. I am not very keen on having a 12.000-line patch to > maintain for qtwebengine which in itself is already hard to maintain. > > Just for fun, I tried to apply the patch to the recently released Qt > Webengine 6.5.2 and unfortunately, a significant number of hunks from > various subpackages could not be applied and would have to be > readjusted. I'm afraid we'll run into the very same problem for each new > Qt release. And that makes such a patch unsuitable.
Thanks for the heads up. Maintaining such a large patch is quite unsuitable. Packaging Chromium has the same issue, but it has fewer lines patch than here. The major issue is to have conflict with ppc64's patch. It is wise to push these changes to Chromium upstream. But it will cost a long time maybe. > > So, unless you have an idea how to avoid running into this problem... Okay, let me think about a workaround before upstream supports this. Thanks again. Bo > > > -- > Med vänliga hälsningar > > Patrick Franz > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to 1030895-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.
