On 24.01.24 09:58, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On 2024-01-23 09:01, Matthias Klose wrote:
This is a long standing, re-occurring issue which never has been
forwarded and committed by the armel ports to GCC upstream.
You seem to be aware of previous occurrences of this issue. Please share
the details you have available such as bug numbers, commits, and so
forth.
More in general though there have been several important issues with
armel lately, not least the fact that there is very little hardware
still supported by the kernel (essentially just the Raspberry Pi Zero
and 1 AIUI [0]). It seems to me that the time has come to seriously
consider whether supporting armel as an official port still makes sense.
[0]
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/b53e2d881063b060934bee3da9378da3b5b5387b
disabled ada, now ftbs with go.
if you care about the Pi Zero, then please get involved upstream.
Listening to ARM guys, armv5t doesn't seem to raise any interest these days.
Also having LLVM build failures, still targeting armv4t didn't raise any
attention to the Debian armel porters.
So let's just say there is no man power to address issues, and probably
also lack of interest.
Matthias
