Version: 121.0.6167.85-1 Tags: patch Sorry for the wrong version in the previous email.
Bo On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:40 AM Bo YU <tsu.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Version: 120.0.6099.216-1 > Tags: patch > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:03:18PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > >Version: 120.0.6099.109-1 > >Tags: patch > > > >Hi, > >On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:52:01PM -0500, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > >>On Thu, 2023 Nov 23 22:44-05:00, Bo YU wrote: > >>> > >>>But likely the Chromium developer has picked this now: > >>>1. angle: > >>>https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/angle/angle/+/5057086 > >>>2. base: > >>>https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5054184 > >>>3. sandbox: > >>>https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5056263 > >>>4. ffmpeg: > >>>https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/5054185 > >>> > >>>we have one dav1d to be left, but the developer told me he has did it. > > > >The good news is that angle and base support riscv64 both was merged by > >chromium upstream. > > > >sandbox and ffmpeg support riscv64 was become more complicated: first > >get approval from Chromium ATLs, see: > >https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/5054185/comments/72ecb31a_56bf277d > > > >https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4935120 > > > >> > >>Thanks Bo. It is good that the upstream is willing to accept patches for > >>riscv64. I was worried that Google would not support the platform, in > >>the same way that they do not support ppc64el. > > > >Thanks. CCing Yahan here also.:) > >> > >>I had considered adjusting the patches here so that they can be applied > >>after the ppc64el patches. (There is no way that a conditional patch set > >>would be accepted by Debian---all the patches have to apply together.) > >>But if the patches are accepted by the upstream, then there is no need > >>to adjust the patches for Debian. > > The good news is that I have adjusted these patches which can be applied > after ppc64el. > > These patches did not change since previous update and I have descripted > their status with upstream support. It seems very pretty that looks like > got upstream support whole. > > BR, > Bo > > > >hmm, this time I have dropped 2 patches which upstream has updated based > >on 120. Later version we will remove more riscv64 patch here. But we all > >know, the most two biggest blockers are sandbox and ffmpeg. > > > >Thanks your suggestions here. > > > >I can cost some time to try apply these patches together and feedback to > >here also. > > > >> > > > >-- > >Regards, > >-- > > Bo YU > > >
