Hi Maarten e.a., On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote: > On Tue Jan 30, 2024 at 2:31 PM CET, Lukas Märdian wrote: > > As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit > > architectures in 2038 and beyond > > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified <snip> > > Thanks for your patch. I am currently in the progress of upgrading these > packages to the new upstream sources after a long hiatus. This would > involve a library transition anyway (libfrog2 -> libfrog3). Is it > sufficient if I include 'Provides: ${t64:Provides}' for the new > libfrog3 package to accomodate this transition? I just did this in > commit 2bbda8d92d40b96a216e8d8db972a9589f8df02f: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frog/-/commit/2bbda8d92d40b96a216e8d8db972a9589f8df02f > > Perhaps that also removes the need for the oddly named frog2t64 package? > If not, I'll apply your patch and rebase my changes on top of it.
Afaik the plan is to keep the binary packages named lib<foo>t64 (reading https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time ); this helps executing the transition. HTH, Bye, Joost
