On 02/02/2024 18:37, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
On 2/2/24 16:14, Alexandra N. Kossovsky wrote:
and riscv64, please.
Unfortunately, riscv64 does not have a dpdk-dev package available, which would be a dependency [1]. I looked at all
dependencies (libnuma-dev, dpdk-dev etc) and used the intersection of their available architectures.
[1] https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/dpdk-dev
apt-cache policy dpdk-dev
dpdk-dev:
Installed: 23.11-1
Candidate: 23.11-1
Version table:
*** 23.11-1 500
500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main riscv64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
riscv64 is not a release architecture, so it is not in bullseye.
--
Alexandra N. Kossovsky
OKTET Labs (http://www.oktetlabs.ru/)
