Hello,
On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:47:19 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?=
<j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Package: afl++
> Version: 4.04c-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-clang-lto(++) if
possible[1].
>
> Based on local tests, "PREFIX=/usr make" will produce an afl-clang-lto
> binary, if lld-14 is also installed (which should be the case, according
> to debian/rules). Not sure what's missing from the Debian package in
> order to get afl-clang-lto.
>
> Best regards,
> jn
>
>
> [1]:
https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/docs/fuzzing_in_depth.md#1-instrumenting-the-target
at this point it seems that afl-clang-lto(++) are parts of the package:
$ apt show afl++ | grep ^Version:
Version: 4.09c-1+b1
$ apt-file show afl++ | grep bin/afl-clang-lto
afl++: /usr/bin/afl-clang-lto
afl++: /usr/bin/afl-clang-lto++
Can we close this bug report then? Or did I misunderstand the bug report?
Best,
Arnaud
