Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the submitters thinks, that sh -e is wrong here, but it is not.
No, the submitter always writes sh -e is his init scripts. Also, he
couldn't find in the Policy whether foo should fail if the package is
not running, but anyways (9.3.2):
restart
stop and restart the service if it's already running,
*otherwise start the service*
which was reported to not be the case, because stop failed AND the -e
option was present. Neither is a problem in itself in my reading of
the Policy, and I'm not sure what stop should do if the service is not
running. Other packages showed inconsistent behaviour.
> that's actually all, and actually, since the original "problem" is a
> non-issue, the bug report can be closed which i do hereby.
It was an issue, but I can't reproduce it anymore. Unfortunately I
can't say when and how it was fixed, the report being so old.
--
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
