Hi!

Here is another bugreport from one of our Debian users.

"Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have servers with multiple addresses on the same interface eth1:
>
> 2: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:1c:c4:a9:73:74 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 172.17.2.6/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global eth1
>     inet 192.168.0.24/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1:0
>     inet 172.17.2.18/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global secondary eth1
>     inet 172.17.2.15/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global secondary eth1
>     inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:fea9:7374/64 scope link
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> cfengine's ${global.ipv4[eth1]} returns 172.17.2.15, which is the last
> address on eth1 (not included eth1:0). I need it return the first
> address of eth1 (172.17.2.6), because other addresses are dynamic and
> under control of the Linux-HA/Heartbeat.
>
> I think cfengine cannot handle this correctly now, could DD fix this or
> forward it to the author?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Chun TIAN (binghe)

I have similar output on servers running Linux Virtual Server [1] and
HP ServiceGuard [2], e.g. like this for LVS:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # ip addr ls
  ...
  12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
      link/ether 00:11:43:de:74:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet x.y.z.47/25 brd x.y.z.127 scope global bond1
      inet x.y.z.20/32 scope global bond1
      inet x.y.z.50/32 scope global bond1
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] / #

So this is a more or less common setup on Linux
cluster-solutions. I've tried a bit with cfengine 2.2.3, and it's the
last IP listed by 'ip addr ls' that cfengine store in the
global.ipv4[ethX]-variable:

  sue:~# ip addr ls
  ...
  3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
  qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:13:ce:a4:e3:e4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 192.168.0.101/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1
      inet 192.168.0.199/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
      eth1
      inet6 fe80::213:ceff:fea4:e3e4/64 scope link 
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  sue:~# cfagent -d3 | grep ipv4
  ...
     590 : ipv4_2[eth1]=192.168
     1895 : ipv4[eth1]=192.168.0.199
     2100 : ipv4_1[eth1]=192
     4049 : ipv4_3[eth1]=192.168.0
  sue:~#

I agree with Chun Tian that the first IP-address listed by
'ip addr ls' should be the one picked up for global.ipvx[ethX], at
least with these kinds of Linux cluster-solutions in mind. What do you
think?

Marry christmas! :)


- Werner

[1] http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
[2] http://h20219.www2.hp.com/enterprise/cache/6468-0-0-0-121.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to