On Sunday 17 February 2008 19:33, James Westby wrote: > I am attaching the patch used in Ubuntu to work around this issue > for your consideration, and so I am also setting the patch tag > again. > > The author of the patch, Daniel Hahler, acknowledges that it is a > workaround, but I believe it is a working solution to the issue.
> diff -pruN 5.10.30-5/debian/rules 5.10.30-5ubuntu3/debian/rules > --- 5.10.30-5/debian/rules 2008-02-04 03:12:53.000000000 +0000 > +++ 5.10.30-5ubuntu3/debian/rules 2008-02-04 03:11:41.000000000 +0000 > @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ install-arch: build > > $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp > > + # udev rule and script for it > + dh_installudev > + install -D debian/extra/udev-usr_share \ > + debian/boinc-client/usr/lib/boinc-client/udev-usr_share Why is udev-usr_share installed into /usr/lib instead of /usr/share although it is architecture-independent? Thanks, -- Frank S. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP public key ID: 0xDC426429 Debian Developer finger fst/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
