On 14/04/08 at 13:55 +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: mplayer > > Version: 1.0~rc2-10 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > i386. > > > > This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is > > now > > the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on i386 yet). > > Feel free to downgrade this bug to 'important' if your package is only built > > on i386, and this bug is specific to gcc 4.3 (i.e the package builds fine > > with > > gcc 4.2). > > hi > > I am not sure on what you mean by the above conditional > ''your package is only built on i386'' AND ''this bug is specific to gcc > 4.3'' > > What I am sure of is that mplayer builds fine with gcc 4.2, so I see this as > a bug in gcc 4.3 , not a bug in mplayer. > > And this is the second bug with gcc 4.3 not being able to build mplayer, the > other bug is 475153 > > Maybe gcc 4.3 is not yet mature enough? Maybe the decision to switch to gcc > 4.3 was a bit too fast?
Don't blame gcc 4.3. It built that code fine last week. Blame dpkg (see my other mail) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
