On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 07:17 +0000, dhbaird wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Package name : pure
I can't help thinking that 'pure-lang' would be a much better package name rather than using such a common word that has multiple meanings. > Version : 0.5 > Upstream Author : Albert Gräf <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> > * URL : http://pure-lang.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPLv3 > Programming Lang: C, C++, LLVM > Description : functional programming language based on term rewriting Long description would appear to be missing. The package name and the long description need to clearly explain what the package can do and why anyone should want to install it. It should also explain "term rewriting" which is not clear to me from what you have provided so far. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
