On 22/06/09 at 09:15 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > t/SearchIO/blastxml..........................dubious > > > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > > > DIED. FAILED tests 148-298 > > > Failed 151/298 tests, 49.33% okay > > > t/SeqIO/bsml_sax.............................dubious > > > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > > > DIED. FAILED tests 2-15 > > > Failed 14/15 tests, 6.67% okay > > > Failed 2/318 test scripts. 165/16485 subtests failed. > > > Files=318, Tests=16485, 172 wallclock secs (81.32 cusr + 6.65 csys = > > > 87.97 CPU) > > > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 255 > > > > The full build log is available from: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/06/20/bioperl_1.6.0-2_lsid64.buildlog > > Bonjour Lucas, > > thanks a lot for your QA efforts, they really impress me. > > In the case of the above errors, I did not reproduce them in a Sid cowbuilder > this morning. The two tests have in common XML parsing… Do you think that > there > could be things preinstalled in your chroot that makes the parsing fail? I > have > not found significant differences in the list of installed build-dependancies.
Hi Charles, It seems that the test make use of internet access, which should not be considered available. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
