On Tuesday 02 March 2010 10:08:24, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, David Paleino wrote: > > I'd like to avoid useless deltas between Debian and Ubuntu, *especially* > > regarding available binary packages. However, my opinion is that > > desktopcouch is a service available on the user's host (together with > > couchdb), so a package needing its functionality should depend on > > "desktopcouch". In my opinion, python-desktopcouch should be merged in > > the aforementioned, and maybe python-desktopcouch-records renamed to > > "desktopcouch-records" -- and move everything out of PYTHONPATH. I > > believe those are "private" modules, not really usable from outside. > > Huh? Such a remark led me wondering if you know what you are packaging. > python-desktopcouch-records is certainly not a private module.
Ehm, right, sorry. Just got confused :) > Coming back to the topic, the dependency between desktopcouch and -records > got added following https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/422179 > but Ken Vandine never gave the error message he had. > > IMO it's this dependency that should not exist and I'm not sure why > the service requires it. Maybe the part of -records that is required > by desktopcouch should be moved to python-desktopcouch. Probably yes. Thanks for your input, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
