On 04-03 16:48, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:08:19 -0700 Ryan Niebur wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:16:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > 
> > > Finally, I am afraid I don't have access to any IPv6 network, hence it
> > > won't be easy for me to investigate this issue.
> > > I hope that Ryan (the other co-maintainer of apt-listbugs) has access
> > > to some IPv6 network...
> > > Ryan, do you have?
> > > 
> > 
> > no. but it sounds like you don't need a network to reproduce this
> > since it's all just with localhost, right?

IPv6 netork is not needed.

It is sufficient to in default privoxy configuration
change "listen-address 127.0.0.1:8118", to "listen-address [::1]:8118"

$ env | grep proxy
http_proxy=http://localhost:8118/
no_proxy=localhost,127.0.0.0/8
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1       localhost
127.0.1.1       sredniczarny
::1     localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
$

I have also nscd package installed and running.


> 
> Well, I don't know: it probably depends on where exactly the problem
> lies.

Somewhere in ruby's libraries probably.

> Hopefully the situation will be clearer, when we get the answers to the
> questions I asked Witold...
> 


Unfortunettly i just tried 'apt-get install something' which will trigger 
apt-listbugs,
but it looks that apt-lisbugs now connect to the internet directly,
despite the fact that there is http_proxy variable.
I do not know why this behaviour changed.

After setting soap_use_proxy=on

i got:
...
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% Fail
Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error message:
 W: Connection refused - connect(2) (http://localhost:8118)
It could be because your network is down, or because of broken proxy servers, 
or the BTS server itself is down. Check network configuration and try again


Neverthless this is other error message i was seying previously.

Is this possible that apt-listbugs used http_proxy WITHOUT soap_use_proxy?
And why this environment variable is needed at all. It would be much better
to have enabled this by default (lack of soap_use_proxy will mean
that one should use http_proxy variable if it is set).




-- 
Witold Baryluk
JID: witold.baryluk // jabster.pl

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to