Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:07:52AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> “debuild binary” is implemented as shorthand for “fakeroot debian/rules >> binary”. >> I think the intended result is better implemented by “debuild -b”, but >> also think --- _if_ it works and does not risk breaking something else --- >> that it is worth changing the tests to make the former work, too. > > Hi Jonathan, I'm fine with your opinion. Provided there are patches > that are technically correct (and I don't doubt that ;), ideally > accepted upstream, I don't obejct to applying them if you suggest so. Based on Faheem’s report, even with the patches, test 7300 manages to confuse fakeroot and is missing the POSIXPERM marker. Apparently the mingw port copes using a workaround added in v1.5.5-rc0~69 (Fix test for cleanup failure in t7300 on Windows, 2008-03-04), so that the true prerequisite is POSIXPERM|CANNOT_UNLINK_OPEN_FILES. Thus it seems that the series needs a little more cooking (ideally upstream, of course). I’ll ping you when it seems ready for experimental. Thanks, both. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
