On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:58:27 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com> (28/04/2010):
> > TIOCNOTTY is defined in a system header file. If the build is
> > failing on this elif, it sounds like you have a missing system
> > header while doing the build. Please report which OS header defines
> > TIOCNOTTY on your BSD based box.
>
> k...@kbsd:~$ grep TIOCNOTTY /usr/include/ -r
> /usr/include/sys/ttycom.h:#define TIOCNOTTY _IO('t', 113)
> /* void tty association */
>
> k...@kbsd:~$ grep ttycom.h -r /usr/include/
> /usr/include/sys/tty.h:#include <sys/ttycom.h>
> /usr/include/bits/ioctls.h:#include <sys/ttycom.h>
>
> Looks like you may want sys/tty.h here?
>
sys/ioctl.h should be enough, and it sounds like TIOCNOTTY *is* defined
in your build. A quick test on the kfreebsd-amd64 porter box shows that
TIOCNOTTY expands as:
((unsigned long) ((0x20000000) | (((0) & 0x1fff) << 16) | ((('t')) << 8) |
((113))))
from <sys/ioccom.h>:
#define _IOC(inout,group,num,len) ((unsigned long) \
((inout) | (((len) & IOCPARM_MASK) << 16) | ((group) << 8) | (num)))
#define _IO(g,n) _IOC(IOC_VOID, (g), (n), 0)
Testing for defined(TIOCNOTTY) instead would probably fix it, I think?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
