Am Donnerstag, den 09.09.2010, 04:23 +0100 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:25 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 05:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:34 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 06:35 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > Then how about convincing the Debian kernel developers to accept these > > > > > patches, and work through any regressions that might be found and > > > > > after > > > > > that, reporting back to us? > > > > > > > > Ben? > > > > > > > > The reason I contacted you was precisely because it went into 2.6.33.2, > > > > e.g. was already accepted into a -stalbe release. I didn't expect it to > > > > be such an issue. > > > > > > That's not likely if people spread FUD about the backlog patches! > > > > > > Dave, did you explicitly exclude these patches from 2.6.32 when you > > > submitted them to stable, or is it just that 5534979 "udp: use limited > > > socket backlog" depends on a1ab77f "ipv6: udp: Optimise multicast > > > reception"? The former patch doesn't look too hard to backport to > > > 2.6.32 (see below). > > > > Anybody? > > We've currently rolled out our own 2.6.32 kernel with these fixes > > applied, and they indeed fix a system crash under our nfs-load. What > > else can I do to get these fixes into either Debians' 2.6.32 or Greg's > > stable 2.6.32 series? > [...] > > These patches will be included in Debian's version 2.6.32-22. We'll see > how that goes.
I owe you a few beers. Thanks a million! > Ben. Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org