On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:29:41PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > tags 623989 +moreinfo > thanks > > Hi! > > * Steve M. Robbins <s...@debian.org> [110425 05:57]: > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > Uhm... It doesn't look, like boost1.42 is obsolete. Even if I ignore > non-release architectures, there's quite a lot of stuff left: > > > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends:
Are reverse dependencies a hinderance to removing the source package? I thought that the binary packages stick around in the archive until they are no longer referenced, then automatically removed. > # Broken Build-Depends: I know that build-deps are a problem. I don't know why I had overlooked that. I checked out the current state and there are presently 7 packages with build-deps on Boost 1.42. I've filed a bug for each of the following source packages: anytun bastet cclive dans-gdal-scripts encfs fracplanet guitarix Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
