On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Francesco Poli <invernom...@paranoici.org> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:51:07 +0000 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report >> which was filed against the conky package: >> >> #579102: please let conky be moved back to main! >> >> It has been closed by <foo...@debian.org>. > [...] >> * Change section of source package from "contrib/utils" to "utils". >> (Closes: #579102) >> - Change section of binary package conky-all to "contrib/utils". > [...] > > Hi Vincent! > Many thanks for adopting conky and for solving the contrib/main issue! > > I wasn't aware that a source package in main could build one contrib > binary package, along with other main binary packages... > How do the buildd's handle this special case? > I mean: do they always have contrib and non-free available in the > configured sources.list, even when building source packages from the > main archive? > I thought that the used chroot environments only had main repositories > available, when building source packages from the main archive. > Otherwise, how can they make sure that no packages outside of main are > used as build-dependencies? > Or is this automatic check missing? > > I am thinking about these aspects, because I suppose that the current > conky source package would FTBFS inside my pbuilder-managed sid chroot > (which only has "main" as configured component). > Or am I completely off-track? > > -- > http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt > New GnuPG key, see the transition document! > ..................................................... Francesco Poli . > GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE >
That's exactly what I thought as well, until my sponsor tried to convince me otherwise. I don't know how the buildds handle this, but it works, so I'm not complaining. Conky still builds fine according to the build logs [1] (aside from a completely unrelated FTBFS on kfreebsd), and Nvidia support is still compiled in and fully working on conky-all i386 and amd64 (I've tested it myself). Looks like a separate conky-all source package is no longer needed. - Vincent [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=conky -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
