On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:31:50PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Package: pinfo >Version: 0.6.9 >Severity: serious >Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > >Trying to get pinfo to build for armhf, but I can see that right now >it doesn't build in unstable for amd64 either: > >$ apt-get source pinfo >... >dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./pinfo_0.6.9-5.dsc >dpkg-source: info: extracting pinfo in pinfo-0.6.9 >dpkg-source: info: unpacking pinfo_0.6.9.orig.tar.gz >dpkg-source: info: applying pinfo_0.6.9-5.diff.gz >$ cd pinfo-0.6.9 >$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b >dpkg-buildpackage: source package pinfo >dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.6.9-5 >dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Bas Zoetekouw <b...@debian.org> >dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 > dpkg-source --before-build pinfo-0.6.9 > fakeroot debian/rules clean >dh_testdir >dh_testroot >rm -f build-stamp install-stamp patch-stamp >dh_clean >rm -rf pinfo-0.6.9 > debian/rules build >dh_testdir >tar xj --no-same-permissions -f pinfo-0.6.9.tar.bz2 >rm -f pinfo-0.6.9/doc/pinfo.info >rm -f pinfo-0.6.9/doc/pinfo.1 >dh_testdir >dpatch -d pinfo-0.6.9 apply-all >applying patch 01_pinforc to /home/steve/build/pinfo/pinfo-0.6.9/pinfo-0.6.9 >...touch: cannot touch `src/pinforc.in': No such file or directory > failed. >make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1 >dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > >Whether this is a bug in pinfo, dpkg-dev or dpatch I have no idea...
Going back to a previous version (2.0.31) of dpatch makes this work. The build then fails later, but that's a different (expected) bug, #646486. dpatch people: is this a dpatch problem, or a bug in pinfo in terms of dpatch usage that's only showing up now? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
