On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:57:24 +0100 Vincent Fourmond <fourm...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Karl Goetz <k...@kgoetz.id.au> > wrote: > > >From [1], it seems the pdf-transcoder.jar in batik contains a > > >colour > > profile with a crazy licence. > > "...permission to use, copy and distribute this file for any > > purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the file is > > not changed including the HP copyright notice tag, ... " > > > > The file will need to be removed from the jar, or the jar (and pdf > > support) removed from batik :/ > > Actually, it's more annoying than this. As far as I can tell, batik > doesn't use this binary jar (and it should have been stripped from the > debian source ages ago). Unfortunately, the jar comes from fop, and > the incriminated file is present in fop source, which makes it > unsuitable for main... Thanks for tracking down the real source of the problem! kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
