On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, the dictd daemon is *not* part of the dict-wn package.  So it might /
> will exist after removing dict-wn.  The package dict-wn just provides one
> possible data file for dict and if it is removed the dictd daemon needs to
> know this (via a restart).  Do you think it is OK considering this?

Ah, yes.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to