AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is surprising. Maybe due to memory limits?
I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be restricted to amd64, arm64, ppc64el and s390x? This should give it enough of architecture heterogeneity to catch any problems that simply do not appear on amd64 (mainstream arch) (yes, I've been bitten by this in one package of mine). This would be a cheap fix (one entry in the control file). Thoughts? (Anyone?) It seems this bug is the only one that prevents it from entering testing (and it's a leaf package). regards, iustin
