hi,
< h01ger> helmut: re: #1041832: i just could not reproduce this bug, see
https://paste.debian.net/1311659/ - though we "didnt change
anything" in sequoia-octopus, so what am i missing? :)that paste had basically this content: ± dpkg -L libsequoia-octopus-librnp |grep librnp.so /usr/lib/sequoia/libsequoia_octopus_librnp.so /usr/lib/thunderbird/librnp.so ± dpkg -L thunderbird|grep librnp.so 1 ± < jochensp> | h01ger: https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=librnp.so&mode=path&suite=unstable&arch=any says on ppc64 < jochensp> | h01ger: also https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm&arch=any&mode=path&searchon=contents&keywords=librnp.so < h01ger> jochensp: what? (re: ppc64 only) < jochensp> | h01ger: also thunderbird (1:115.0.1-1) has: [f78b777] d/mozconfig.default: Use internal shipped librnp version and 1:115.1.1-1 reverts that < jochensp> (and ppc64 is out of date in unstable) < h01ger> jochensp: ah! [f78b777] - thank you! < h01ger> jochensp: can i quote you in that bug? < jochensp> | h01ger: sure < h01ger> :) thanks! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Just because other people are also responsible, does not mean you are not responsible.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
