Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:19:32 +0000
with message-id <e1s0vmu-009dre...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1064089: fixed in gutenprint 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064089,
regarding gutenprint: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1064089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gutenprint
Version: 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!

Dear maintainer,

As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
gutenprint as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI either
is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be analyzed via
abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe side we assume is
affected).

To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their
reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to have a
library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the runtime
library package.

Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
together in time.  Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for gutenprint.

Please find the patch for this NMU attached.

Unfortunately, due to unrelated bugs (bug #1064088), your package fails to
build in unstable and therefore we will not be uploading an NMU for this.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gutenprint
Source-Version: 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2
Done: Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gutenprint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1064...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de> (supplier of updated gutenprint package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:10:00 +0200
Source: gutenprint
Architecture: source
Version: 5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Printing Group <debian-print...@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>
Closes: 1064088 1064089
Changes:
 gutenprint (5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * do not build this package on 32bit architectures anymore
     Closes: #1064088
     Closes: #1064089
     There was no patch attached to #1064089, so I can not reproduce the
     problems mentioned in #1064088. I am fed up with this poorly done
     transition, so I won't spend more time with this. Sorry 32bit people.
Checksums-Sha1:
 263f3b632560f12513538b513e696e0db53eb8da 3210 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.dsc
 f070be098b05810df047571faa521c7cec690b54 95036 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.debian.tar.xz
 a8e143047c6f88a82d89d031ccff7acd64497c0a 20798 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 6661d2a2c7a9c6615c188217c93ddb7db4635d24474cd61e2f7ac144e8fd7174 3210 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.dsc
 858c4091f2d9418f9e35cb37b0d2bfe181a819ddd4a08c00eedfae8a1816bf68 95036 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.debian.tar.xz
 4e06c6331a979761b6d018a5cd9862099f92da2c2146ec6fb49de6501b07c7ca 20798 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 ea7ac1f5ff28e39aeaeb7108783a112a 3210 graphics optional 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.dsc
 51151ed4e4d37c3ee58d2a49eb1bf9ff 95036 graphics optional 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2.debian.tar.xz
 4e7da99d74f3f2403cbb3988d8242aa5 20798 graphics optional 
gutenprint_5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=tsJ1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpwvCH61oUCs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to