On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank K�ster wrote: > martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to > > testing. > > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control) > > without making it clear which one is meant. > > Furthermore, for testing propagation i'ts "urgency" that matters, isn't > it?
Hi Frank,
isnt that addressed by the tag "Urgency: Low|Medium|High"?
>
> And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
> to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan
> some packages, but this isn't a bug, just conversation. In the BTS, I
> think the tag is simply "O".
>
so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to
debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages?
ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded package on
debian-devel'.
-Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
