On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the > admin to define.
Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that defines what at least runlevel 2 and 3 are for. I would really like to see that Debian complies with the FHS in that case, when it complies to it in the other meanings also, quite strict, even. Just a thought... Alfie -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday
pgp0SgW8Mx9vM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
