The big package breakups have historically been related to licensing issues (either a license incompatibility that's been pointed out or a change in licensing that broke compatibility), so the bug pointing out the license issue might be seen as forcing the breakup...
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:47:22AM -0700, erik wrote: > > > I just can't keep my mouth shut about this any longer and the > > > unnecassary divisions (read demolitions) of KDE packages are the last > > > straw > > BTW, what would it take for someone to be forced to break up a package > or make some other major change? The only thing I can think of that could > do it is a amendment to policy or something more drastic. (Is this written > in some document that I need to read?) > > -- You have paid nothing for the preceding, therefore it's worth every penny you've paid for it: if you did pay for it, might I remind you of the immortal words of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money? Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
