hi On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:42:02PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > A Mennucc1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit hey, I like this ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do you study latin?
> > arch= w32 > > arch64= w64 > > pro: it has been proposed by many parts (and actually it was my > > second-nearly-first choice); no trademark problems > > con: I think it is not so appealing to the layuser; and > > I dont like the arch64 <-> arch relationship > > Hmm... layuser ? > It's just an arch. Use this. > It has been an "agreed-upon" string for emacs, AFAICR yes I was told > The only problem this has, AFAIK, is that > it reserves this word for cygwin, while some others may > port Debian to mingw, for example. > But I shouldn't worry about that. > yes, who cares? ok, I think I will switch again to w32 I say again because that was my choice for 3 days, and then I thought that I didnt like w32 <-> w64 ; but again , who cares? anyway, Real Life (tm) is hitting me hard; summer is over; if I find some web space I will put the work I did there, otherwise, the world will wait a. -- A Mennucc "? un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Renato Carotone)