Hi Is this really a bug?
Regards, // Ola ----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:48:06 +0200 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:48:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 158547 X-Debian-PR-Package: imp X-Debian-PR-Keywords: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:32:00 -0600 (CST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=SENT_BY_BTS,NO_REAL_NAME,FORGED_RCVD_FOUND version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Package: imp Version: N/A Severity: normal IMP depends on many packages marked as essential, such as sed or grep, which should not appear explicitly listed. (It also depends on many packages from 'standard': binutils, perl, mail-transport-agent. I don't remember if those should be also listed) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux conetontli 2.4.18 #1 Thu Jun 13 09:08:16 CST 2002 alpha unknown unknown GNU/Linux ----- End forwarded message ----- -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
